We're calling on all EU-based Mozillians with iOS or iPadOS devices to help us monitor Apple’s new browser choice screens. Join the effort to hold Big Tech to account!

Търсене в помощните статии

Избягвайте измамите при поддръжката. Никога няма да ви помолим да се обадите или изпратите SMS на телефонен номер или да споделите лична информация. Моля, докладвайте подозрителна активност на "Докладване за злоупотреба".

Научете повече

Quick Filter Still extremely slow

  • 4 отговора
  • 2 имат този проблем
  • Последен отговор от Wayne Mery

more options

Quick Filter is still extremely slow on the newest version of Thunderbird (128.1.1esr). I asked a question about this previously. It was reported as a bug (see links below) and it says in the report it was fixed, but the problem still seems to be there in the newest version. Any idea when this will be fixed, or if there is anything I can do about it?

There is a thread about it on reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/Thunderbird/comments/1e6hryp/quick_filter_is_super_slow_in_128/

There was a bug reported, and it is listed as closed (solved). Here is the bug report thread: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1908761

Thanks for you help.

Quick Filter is still extremely slow on the newest version of Thunderbird (128.1.1esr). I asked a question about this previously. It was reported as a bug (see links below) and it says in the report it was fixed, but the problem still seems to be there in the newest version. Any idea when this will be fixed, or if there is anything I can do about it? There is a thread about it on reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/Thunderbird/comments/1e6hryp/quick_filter_is_super_slow_in_128/ There was a bug reported, and it is listed as closed (solved). Here is the bug report thread: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1908761 Thanks for you help.

Всички отговори (4)

more options

The fix is in TB 131 beta and might appear in the next 128 release. For a workaround:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1908761#c5

Полезно?

more options

Please check 128.2.0 next week.

Полезно?

more options

Wayne Mery said

Please check 128.2.0 next week.

128.4.0esr and it still freezes completely for ≈ 20 sec. when using it with the 'Body' option on a large (10.000 items) folder. Some more remarks:

  • Bug 1908761 has been closed (too soon IMHO), but there is another one describing this issue still open: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=383895 . Only 17 years old.
  • When I press <Enter> after a text in the Quick Filter, TB seems to switch to a blazing fast search, I think the same as the 'Ctrl + K' search that is cluttering the title bar. For me this would be a perfect replacement for the Quick Filter if itwould default to just the current folder and show just a message list (like in Outlook).

Полезно?

more options

YeOldNerd said

Wayne Mery said

Please check 128.2.0 next week.

128.4.0esr and it still freezes completely for ≈ 20 sec. when using it with the 'Body' option on a large (10.000 items) folder. Some more remarks:

If your body search got worse in version 128, then 383895 is not likely to be your issue.

1908761 was for a specific issue which has a specific patch. And it gets closed when that patch is confirmed to help that specific issue.

YeOldNerd said

Wayne Mery said

* When I press <Enter> after a text in the Quick Filter, TB seems to switch to a blazing fast search, I think the same as the 'Ctrl + K' search that is cluttering the title bar. For me this would be a perfect replacement for the Quick Filter if itwould default to just the current folder and show just a message list (like in Outlook).

ctrl+K is global SEARCH, which pre-indexes all messages from all folders,

quick FILTER is a filter which has always acted only on the specific folder being viewed. it is "live", in other words not pre-indexed. So it is expected that body search will be a bit slow because it must search an entire folder of messages.

Променено на от Wayne Mery

Полезно?

Задаване на въпрос

You must log in to your account to reply to posts. Please start a new question, if you do not have an account yet.