We're calling on all EU-based Mozillians with iOS or iPadOS devices to help us monitor Apple’s new browser choice screens. Join the effort to hold Big Tech to account!

搜尋 Mozilla 技術支援網站

防止技術支援詐騙。我們絕對不會要求您撥打電話或發送簡訊,或是提供個人資訊。請用「回報濫用」功能回報可疑的行為。

了解更多

Archive behaving oddly: applying mixed rules

  • 2 回覆
  • 1 有這個問題
  • 4 次檢視
  • 最近回覆由 KiDy

more options

I have configured the archive mails in the Archive folder for the account, and under 'Options' I have selected 'A single folder' and ticked 'Keep existing folder structure...'

When launching an archive action, the folder structure is created properly and MOST of the mails are archived in the relevant subfolders, but some files are archived as if I had not checked the 'Keep existing folder structure...' but instead just selected 'Yerly archived folders'.

It happens within same launch of the Archive action.

I have tried to review the characteristics of the files that are properly archived in the folder tree and those archived according to year. I cannot figure out what is governing how the mails are archived.

Am I missing something?

I have configured the archive mails in the Archive folder for the account, and under 'Options' I have selected 'A single folder' and ticked 'Keep existing folder structure...' When launching an archive action, the folder structure is created properly and MOST of the mails are archived in the relevant subfolders, but some files are archived as if I had not checked the 'Keep existing folder structure...' but instead just selected 'Yerly archived folders'. It happens within same launch of the Archive action. I have tried to review the characteristics of the files that are properly archived in the folder tree and those archived according to year. I cannot figure out what is governing how the mails are archived. Am I missing something?

由 KiDy 於 修改

所有回覆 (2)

more options

Perhaps https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668215

See especially comment 42

more options

Wayne Mery said

Perhaps https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668215 See especially comment 42

Thanks, but both identities were already set up correctly/identically.