搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信,及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

Can the time out for loading a page be extended for busy sites?

  • 4 个回答
  • 107 人有此问题
  • 3 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 mcleandave

more options

(Error:) Problem loading page The connection has timed out The server at xxx.xxx is taking too long to respond.

   *   The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few moments.

Question: Is there a way to extend the time out for sites which are known to be busy?

(Error:) Problem loading page The connection has timed out The server at xxx.xxx is taking too long to respond. * The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few moments. Question: Is there a way to extend the time out for sites which are known to be busy?

所有回复 (4)

more options

Sorry, there is no setting for that in Firefox. You need to change it in Windows. This article is a bit "dated"and it applies to WinXP. See if it helps you, or search for a newer article for Vista.

http://drewthaler.blogspot.com/2005/09/changing-dns-query-timeout-in-windows.html

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\DNSQueryTimeouts Multi String: "1 2 2 4 8 0" -> "4 8 8 16 32 0"

more options

Thanks for the reply, it seemed very promising. However, once accomplished, it didn't seem to affect the timeout period, even when the numbers were made much larger. My guess is that the timeout is being controlled by my router, unless this registry entry simply doesn't work for Vista. I will let you know if I find new info.

more options

I've just encountered this problem with FF4. Doesn't happen with FF3.6.16 nor IE8. It happens when redirected from a secure payments page to a 'verified by visa' page. The error message pops up.

more options

This issue appears under two different Mozzila "Questions". Both appear to have the same OUTDATED, INEFFECTIVE ANSWERS. A lot of us are on WIN7 now and still have erratic network speeds due to cable multiplexing -- but have been trained to leave the registry alone. Has not anyone solved this problem -- other than going notoriously unreliable FIOS ??