Avatar for Username

搜索 | 用户支持

防范以用户支持为名的诈骗。我们绝对不会要求您拨打电话或发送短信，及提供任何个人信息。请使用“举报滥用”选项报告涉及违规的行为。

详细了解

话题已存档。 如果需要帮助请提出新问题。

Exporting Address Book to a vCard file does not attach a phone number type to all phone numbers

  • 3 个回答
  • 1 人有此问题
  • 8 次查看
  • 最后回复者为 droesler

droesler
droesler
more options

When exporting the Address Book to a vCard file not all telephone numbers have a type attached to them. Some are like this TEL;VALUE=TEXT:xxx-xxx-xxx and some are like this TEL;TYPE=home;VALUE=TEXT:xxx xxx-xxxx.

I've tried deleting the phone number, save the change, then input the phone number and save the change, and then export again, but no change - still no TYPE info.

Has anyone had this same experience or know what may cause this?

And yes, I have tried the vCard plugin but I don't use that because selecting a list entry in the compose window automatically expands the list :-(

Dennis

When exporting the Address Book to a vCard file not all telephone numbers have a type attached to them. Some are like this '''TEL;VALUE=TEXT:xxx-xxx-xxx''' and some are like this '''TEL;TYPE=home;VALUE=TEXT:xxx xxx-xxxx'''. I've tried deleting the phone number, save the change, then input the phone number and save the change, and then export again, but no change - still no TYPE info. Has anyone had this same experience or know what may cause this? And yes, I have tried the vCard plugin but I don't use that because selecting a list entry in the compose window automatically expands the list :-( Dennis

所有回复 (3)

droesler
droesler 提问者
more options

I should have mentioned TB 91.3.2 and Win10 with latest updates.

Matt
Matt
  • Moderator
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

It does not appear that the type is compulsory. https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6350.html#section-5.6 and I am assuming that work numbers are getting no Type value work, but home numbers are.

droesler
droesler 提问者
more options

I did look at the RFC, the cardinality of different tags, and also understand that a TYPE tag is not required.

I'm just wondering on the export why some phone numbers get a type tag and others don't. Is it something about the way the data is stored in the Address Book database? In the Address Book UI all the phone numbers are in the respective phone number fields.

I thought that it may have had something to do with when the Address Book was moved from .pab to sqlLite storage that something didn't get put where it was supposed to go. That is why I deleted the number, saved that record, and then re-entered it and saved it again.