Tìm kiếm hỗ trợ

Tránh các lừa đảo về hỗ trợ. Chúng tôi sẽ không bao giờ yêu cầu bạn gọi hoặc nhắn tin đến số điện thoại hoặc chia sẻ thông tin cá nhân. Vui lòng báo cáo hoạt động đáng ngờ bằng cách sử dụng tùy chọn "Báo cáo lạm dụng".

Tìm hiểu thêm

Latest Firefox Dev 64 bit @ Win8 does not detect Java 8u51 64 bit

  • 14 trả lời
  • 105 gặp vấn đề này
  • 6 lượt xem
  • Trả lời mới nhất được viết bởi Ondřej

more options

Java 8u45 worked OK in Firefox Dev 64 bit. This week I uninstalled Java 8u45 and installed new Java 8u51 into `C:\Java`. Now the plugin is not listed in Plugins at about:addons.

Java 8u45 worked OK in Firefox Dev 64 bit. This week I uninstalled Java 8u45 and installed new Java 8u51 into `C:\Java`. Now the plugin is not listed in Plugins at about:addons.

Giải pháp được chọn

at the moment it's a hardcoded whitelist in firefox so i don't think it possible to work around that. maybe there will be some form of user controlled whitelist at a later stage, but the strategy that was put forward for win64 around plugins is a "clean slate approach": https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/win64/meetingarchive#Clean_Slate_Approach

Đọc câu trả lời này trong ngữ cảnh 👍 2

Tất cả các câu trả lời (14)

more options

hi iki, that's to be expected - windows 64bit versions come with limited plugin support at the moment (only flash is whitelisted). if you depend on other npapi plugins please continue to use regular 32bit builds.

more options

hi philipp, thanks for fast reply.

I can switch to 32 bit, but would prefer to stay with 64 bit. Is there a way to whitelist the Java plugin? I'm asking, because it worked perfectly with our Java app before last Firefox Dev update.

more options

Giải pháp được chọn

at the moment it's a hardcoded whitelist in firefox so i don't think it possible to work around that. maybe there will be some form of user controlled whitelist at a later stage, but the strategy that was put forward for win64 around plugins is a "clean slate approach": https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox/win64/meetingarchive#Clean_Slate_Approach

more options

OK, that makes sense

... otoh Java plugin could be evaluated too, because NPAPI is now definitely disabled in Chrome>=42, and Firefox is the first choice for Java apps atm.

more options

Weelll folks that means your only choice for Java at this point is Window Internet Explorer which worked today with Java 8 u66.

I think it is not-acceptable to not retain support for Java in the 64-bit frame while supporting it in the 32-bit version.

Another important point, is to take care of users, not like Chrome and provide a transition from the now plug-in container scheme to the new plug-in container scheme(s) -- Plural because these things are always improving. Be agile, ... be prepared.

philipp said

at the moment it's a hardcoded whitelist in firefox ...
more options

I am praying for Java support in 64bit version of Firefox for Windows. There is no other acceptable web browser for me.

more options

If you need Java install the 32-bit version of Firefox to use when you want Java. It is possible to have both the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Firefox installed.

more options

the-edmeister said

If you need Java install the 32-bit version of Firefox to use when you want Java. It is possible to have both the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Firefox installed.

Why should I have installed two versions?! I installed 64bit version just to utilize 16 GB of memory so I will not install 32bit version. Is 64bit Java support planned or not?

more options

No, it isn't planned.

And by the end of 2016 or in early 2017, Firefox won't be supporting any Plugins at all. All web browsers are in the process dropping "Plugins".

more options

the-edmeister said

No, it isn't planned. And by the end of 2016 or in early 2017, Firefox won't be supporting any Plugins at all. All web browsers are in the process dropping "Plugins".

I hope that this is some really bad joke.

more options
more options
more options

XPI extensions has nothing to do with the end of support for NPAPI Plugins; two different types of add-ons.

more options

According to this, Adobe Flash which uses NPAPI will be supported furthermore. I think NPAPI should be dropped completely, not partially.