Avatar for Username

ค้นหาฝ่ายสนับสนุน

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

เรียนรู้เพิ่มเติม

หัวข้อนี้ถูกเก็บถาวรแล้ว โปรดถามคำถามใหม่หากคุณต้องการความช่วยเหลือ

Debugger source list pane not organized by directory

  • 2 การตอบกลับ
  • 1 คนมีปัญหานี้
  • 1 ครั้งที่ดู
  • ตอบกลับล่าสุดโดย sammmuel

sammmuel
sammmuel
more options

The debugger source list pane is not organized by collapsible directory tree for me. This reference page clearly says that it should and has a screen shot.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Debugger/UI_Tour#Source_list_pane

Is there an option I'm missing? It is much more convenient to have the script organized like in Chrome.

Firefox Developer Edition 55 Archlinux

The debugger source list pane is not organized by collapsible directory tree for me. This reference page clearly says that it should and has a screen shot. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Debugger/UI_Tour#Source_list_pane Is there an option I'm missing? It is much more convenient to have the script organized like in Chrome. Firefox Developer Edition 55 Archlinux
ภาพหน้าจอที่แนบมา

วิธีแก้ปัญหาที่เลือก

cor-el,

Thank you for taking the time to respond to my question and attaching the screen shot. I tried the nightly 56.0a1 and you are correct. It seems to be working very smoothly and the UI is a bit nicer so I think I will try using it for awhile.

Thanks!

อ่านคำตอบนี้ในบริบท 👍 0

การตอบกลับทั้งหมด (2)

cor-el
cor-el
  • Moderator
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

I see this feature in the current Nightly build (56.0a1), so you will have to wait until this lands in the Developer Edition.

The documents on the MDN website usually reflect the state of the latest Nightly builds version and not all features may be present in other releases.

sammmuel
sammmuel เจ้าของคำถาม
more options

วิธีแก้ปัญหาที่เลือก

cor-el,

Thank you for taking the time to respond to my question and attaching the screen shot. I tried the nightly 56.0a1 and you are correct. It seems to be working very smoothly and the UI is a bit nicer so I think I will try using it for awhile.

Thanks!