Pesquisar no apoio

Evite burlas no apoio. Nunca iremos solicitar que telefone ou envie uma mensagem de texto para um número de telefone ou que partilhe informações pessoais. Por favor, reporte atividades suspeitas utilizando a opção "Reportar abuso".

Saber mais

Firefox never frees memory despite TabData reporting that the tab's memory usage has decreased

  • 1 resposta
  • 4 têm este problema
  • 3 visualizações
  • Última resposta por guigs

more options

I work on a single page web application that is ran in Firefox. The user navigates from screen to screen. Each screen is loaded via AJAX and the page is not completely refreshed until the user is done with our app. A concern our Firefox users have been having is high memory usage. I have been looking into the problem using the TabData and Tab Memory Usage Firefox extensions. The tab our app runs in appears to be freeing up memory gracefully as our users navigation from a memory intensive screen to a less memory intensive screen. However, if I view the firefox process in the Windows Resource Monitor, Firefox continues to use more and more memory and never frees it, even when I close the tab the application was running in. Are these extensions inaccurate? Is there something fundamental about Firefox's memory model I am not understanding?

I work on a single page web application that is ran in Firefox. The user navigates from screen to screen. Each screen is loaded via AJAX and the page is not completely refreshed until the user is done with our app. A concern our Firefox users have been having is high memory usage. I have been looking into the problem using the TabData and Tab Memory Usage Firefox extensions. The tab our app runs in appears to be freeing up memory gracefully as our users navigation from a memory intensive screen to a less memory intensive screen. However, if I view the firefox process in the Windows Resource Monitor, Firefox continues to use more and more memory and never frees it, even when I close the tab the application was running in. Are these extensions inaccurate? Is there something fundamental about Firefox's memory model I am not understanding?

Todas as respostas (1)

more options

Possibly even if there are different measurements in different sources. Do these troubleshooting steps help still: