Avatar for Username

Pesquisar no site de suporte

Evite golpes de suporte. Nunca pedimos que você ligue ou envie uma mensagem de texto para um número de telefone, ou compartilhe informações pessoais. Denuncie atividades suspeitas usando a opção “Denunciar abuso”.

Saiba mais

Esta discussão foi arquivada. Faça uma nova pergunta se precisa de ajuda.

Is it possible that Firefox prevents serverside includes (SSI) from functioning?

  • 2 respostas
  • 1 tem este problema
  • 2 visualizações
  • Última resposta de jerryerp

jerryerp
jerryerp
more options

I am no doubt asking in the wrong place, but...I have Apache2 running on a linux locally. I believe I have set it up to support server-side includes. I have a cgi-bin perl script, hell.pl: 

#!/usr/bin/perl

print "Content-type: text/html\n\n";
print "Hello, world\n";
exit;

Under Firefox, I can generate the Hello World page through the url

xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/cgi-bin/hell.pl

where xxx.xxx... is the apache2 server address.

But if I try to do that via the html file: 

<HTML>
<HEAD></HEAD>
Test:<BR>
<BODY>
<!--#include virtual=/cgi-bin/hell.pl" -->
</BODY></HTML>

All I get is page which is blank except for the "Test:" on line 1. The apache error and access logs show no relevant problems, as if the browser treats the serverside include as a comment.

I realize that the fault no doubt lies with the apache2 configuration, but I have studied and studied... and am now clutching at straws.

I am no doubt asking in the wrong place, but...I have Apache2 running on a linux locally. I believe I have set it up to support server-side includes. I have a cgi-bin perl script, hell.pl: <br /> <pre><nowiki>#!/usr/bin/perl print "Content-type: text/html\n\n"; print "Hello, world\n"; exit; </nowiki></pre> Under Firefox, I can generate the Hello World page through the url xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/cgi-bin/hell.pl where xxx.xxx... is the apache2 server address. But if I try to do that via the html file: <br /> <pre><nowiki><HTML> <HEAD></HEAD> Test:<BR> <BODY> <!--#include virtual=/cgi-bin/hell.pl" --> </BODY></HTML> </nowiki></pre> All I get is page which is blank except for the "Test:" on line 1. The apache error and access logs show no relevant problems, as if the browser treats the serverside include as a comment. I realize that the fault no doubt lies with the apache2 configuration, but I have studied and studied... and am now clutching at straws.

Alterado por cor-el em

Solução escolhida

jerryerp wrote: 

Is it possible that Firefox prevents serverside includes (SSI) from functioning?

I don't see how. A browser can only botch client-side scripting like Javascript.

jerryerp wrote: 

I realize that the fault no doubt lies with the apache2 configuration [...]

By default, SSI is only interpreted for special file extensions like .shtml. See the “Configuring your server to permit SSI” section of the Apache tutorial for details on how to change this.

Ler esta resposta 👍 1

Todas as respostas (2)

Gingerbread Man
Gingerbread Man
more options

Solução escolhida

jerryerp wrote: 

Is it possible that Firefox prevents serverside includes (SSI) from functioning?

I don't see how. A browser can only botch client-side scripting like Javascript.

jerryerp wrote: 

I realize that the fault no doubt lies with the apache2 configuration [...]

By default, SSI is only interpreted for special file extensions like .shtml. See the “Configuring your server to permit SSI” section of the Apache tutorial for details on how to change this.

jerryerp
jerryerp Autor da pergunta
more options

But not entirely. In the first instance, I tried the .shtml route suggested in the docs section by adding the Options, Addtype, and AddOutputFilters lines to the .htaccess file in /.htdocs and renamed hello.html to hello.shtml. At first, this simply created a page listing the hello.shtml file. Then I moved the configuration changes to the httpd configuration file and restarted apache. The result was the same as I reported earlier. Changing the hell.pl reference in hello.shtml and the file name in the cgi-bin directory to hell.shtml gave the same result.

Next I tried the XBitHack method to yield the result I reported earlier. It seems then that something hidden in my configuration file is the problem. Thanks anyway.