Mozilla Firefox Disables "Multirow Bookmark Toolbar" Customization (Userchrome.css) in Firefox 67 Beta 4
Mozilla? Major FAIL! The one thing that worked for me was the ability to customize a userchrome.css so that I could get the multirow toolbar to work through a customized "userchrome.css" file. CONGRATS (spoken with sarcasm) on releasing a new version of Firefox that completely ignores the userchrome.css file.
My current userchrome.css files looks like this:
/* Multi-Row Bookmarks Toolbar */
- PersonalToolbar {
/* Provide room for up to 4 rows at 26px */ max-height: 115px !important; }
- PlacesToolbarItems > box {
display: inline-block !important; }
- PersonalToolbar #PlacesToolbarItems {
/* Override hiding */ overflow-x: visible !important; overflow-y: visible !important; /* Add a little cushion */ padding-bottom: 1px; }
- PersonalToolbar #PlacesToolbarItems .bookmark-item {
/* Reduce padding on individual bookmarks to fit rows closer together */ padding-top: 1px !important; padding-bottom: 1px !important; } .tabbrowser-tab::before, .tabbrowser-tab::after{
display: none !important;
} toolbarbutton.bookmark-item {
font-size:13px !important;
}
It no longer works as Firefox 67 completely ignores the file. If anyone has a suggestion, I'm all ears. Otherwise, I'll be dumping Firefox (after being a user for some 15+ years and switching to another web browser. Mozilla keeps removing vital functions of Firefox to make it less user friendly then it was before.
Wszystkie odpowiedzi (2)
This didn't affect you when you were using Firefox 66? There was a structural change to the bar and it's easy to find new style recipes now. For example:
https://www.reddit.com/r/FirefoxCSS/comments/b346fz/firefox_66_destroyed_my_more_toolbars_fix/
https://www.userchrome.org/what-is-userchrome-css.html#multirowbookmarks
It really didn't when I upgraded to Firefox 66. Don't know why. But thanks for posting that link. It worked perfectly. There are certain links that I have in my toolbar and it's become an important feature of Firefox for me. Thanks for the reference link.