Avatar for Username

Pretraži podršku

Izbjegni prevare podrške. Nikad te nećemo tražiti da nas nazoveš, da nam pošalješ telefonski broj ili da podijeliš osobne podatke. Prijavi sumnjive radnje pomoću opcije „Prijavi zlouporabu”.

Saznaj više

Ova tema je arhivirana. Postavi novo pitanje ako trebaš pomoć.

Thunderbird, numbered list in combination with ident

  • 1 odgovor
  • 1 ima ovaj problem
  • 8 prikaza
  • Posljednji odgovor od Toad-Hall

m.vdsluis
m.vdsluis
more options

Hi, In Thunderbird, if you use a numbered list with text indentation to indicate subnumbers, the result is not correct.

1. Verbeterpunten: kijk nog even bij het verslag van 27 januari 2020 wat ook bla....... 2. De wedstrijddatums: 

       1. Laaxum:
       2. Oudega
       3. Stavoren
       4. Hindeloopen

5. Test1 6. Test2 at the beginning of line "1. Laaxum" I did a ident and Thunderbird starts that line with number 1. That is correct But when I ident back after "4 Hindeloopen" it would be normal that the line "Test1" continue's with 3 and not with 5. When jou double click on a line with a number 'list properties' is opened. But it is not possible to change the number. Is there a possibility to change de line numbers ore is it a bug?

Hi, In Thunderbird, if you use a numbered list with text indentation to indicate subnumbers, the result is not correct. 1. Verbeterpunten: kijk nog even bij het verslag van 27 januari 2020 wat ook bla....... 2. De wedstrijddatums: 1. Laaxum: 2. Oudega 3. Stavoren 4. Hindeloopen 5. Test1 6. Test2 at the beginning of line "1. Laaxum" I did a ident and Thunderbird starts that line with number 1. That is correct But when I ident back after "4 Hindeloopen" it would be normal that the line "Test1" continue's with 3 and not with 5. When jou double click on a line with a number 'list properties' is opened. But it is not possible to change the number. Is there a possibility to change de line numbers ore is it a bug?

Svi odgovori (1)

Toad-Hall
Toad-Hall
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

Yes it is a bug. There seems to be some share of code with Firefox and so need to bare in mind that although bug is reported, it may be dependent on other bug fixes first. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1611861 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1636766