Pretraži podršku

Izbjegni prevare podrške. Nikad te nećemo tražiti da nas nazoveš, da nam pošalješ telefonski broj ili da podijeliš osobne podatke. Prijavi sumnjive radnje pomoću opcije „Prijavi zlouporabu”.

Saznaj više

filter move followed by another move duplicates message

  • 3 odgovora
  • 3 imaju ovaj problem
  • 1 prikaz
  • Posljednji odgovor od Wirewrap

more options

Running Thunderbird 31.4.0 on Windows 7 64-bit

I have two filters in my inbox

Filter Wildcard: If To doesn´t contain "xxxxxxxx" Move message to Wildcard

Filter MoveAll: Move Message to Incoming

After sending a message that correctly goes to wildcard there is a unwanted action of "MoveAll" that makes a duplicate of the wildcarded message.

Filter log : Applied filter "Wildcard" to message from Lars <[email protected]> - sssss at 2015-02-06 22:51:08 moved message id = [email protected] to mailbox://nobody@Local%20Folders/Wildcard

Applied filter "MoveAll" to message from - at 1970-01-01 01:00:00 moved message id = to mailbox://nobody@Local%20Folders/Incoming

Running Thunderbird 31.4.0 on Windows 7 64-bit I have two filters in my inbox Filter Wildcard: If To doesn´t contain "xxxxxxxx" Move message to Wildcard Filter MoveAll: Move Message to Incoming After sending a message that correctly goes to wildcard there is a unwanted action of "MoveAll" that makes a duplicate of the wildcarded message. Filter log : Applied filter "Wildcard" to message from Lars <[email protected]> - sssss at 2015-02-06 22:51:08 moved message id = [email protected] to mailbox://nobody@Local%20Folders/Wildcard Applied filter "MoveAll" to message from - at 1970-01-01 01:00:00 moved message id = to mailbox://nobody@Local%20Folders/Incoming

Izmjenjeno od Wirewrap

Izabrano rješenje

Maybe you need to add the "stop filter execution" action to the first filter?

Pročitaj ovaj odgovor u kontekstu 👍 2

Svi odgovori (3)

more options

Odabrano rješenje

Maybe you need to add the "stop filter execution" action to the first filter?

more options

Zenos said

Maybe you need to add the "stop filter execution" action to the first filter?

Is there a point in having "Stop filter execution" as last action in a filter? I will try it and see.

For most messages, when the first filter isn´t triggered I want the second filter to take effect.

Sort of:

if (first filter trigger ) then

  <one action>

else

 <other action>

Izmjenjeno od Wirewrap

more options

Zenos said

Maybe you need to add the "stop filter execution" action to the first filter?

This post removed, my mistake.

Izmjenjeno od Wirewrap