Avatar for Username

Rechercher dans l’assistance

Évitez les escroqueries à l’assistance. Nous ne vous demanderons jamais d’appeler ou d’envoyer un SMS à un numéro de téléphone ou de partager des informations personnelles. Veuillez signaler toute activité suspecte en utilisant l’option « Signaler un abus ».

En savoir plus

Ce sujet de discussion a été archivé. Veuillez poser une nouvelle question si vous avez besoin d’aide.

How to "convert" an existing POP account => IMAP *without* creating a new one

  • 2 réponses
  • 0 a ce problème
  • 6 vues
  • Dernière réponse par firefox1489

firefox1489
firefox1489
more options

Hello,

I have a lot of POP accounts in TB that I need to convert to IMAP (cause my provider has now ceased POP support completely), and I'd like to know if it's possible convert an existing POP account to an IMAP *avoiding* the creation of a parallel new IMAP account as it's suggested in FAQ. The problem is that in these POP accounts I have a lot of mails (30 GB) and a lot o rules created in years that I have to rebuild from scrath if I need to create a new IMAP account of every POP that I have now.

Thanks in advance :-)

Hello, I have a lot of POP accounts in TB that I need to convert to IMAP (cause my provider has now ceased POP support completely), and I'd like to know if it's possible convert an existing POP account to an IMAP *avoiding* the creation of a parallel new IMAP account as it's suggested in FAQ. The problem is that in these POP accounts I have a lot of mails (30 GB) and a lot o rules created in years that I have to rebuild from scrath if I need to create a new IMAP account of every POP that I have now. Thanks in advance :-)

Toutes les réponses (2)

Matt
Matt
  • Moderator
  • Top 10 Contributor
more options

The short answer is you can not. Some 10 years ago we wrote those support articles because it was not possible. Nothing has changed in that regard and it is unlikely to ever change.

firefox1489
firefox1489 Auteur de la question
more options

That's real pity :-( Thank you for the answer anyway.