Etsi tuesta

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Lue lisää

what happened to context menu open link in new window?

  • 5 vastausta
  • 1 henkilöllä on sama ongelma
  • 1 näyttö
  • Viimeisin kirjoittaja ral

more options

The right-click context menu as late as yesterday, 8-01-18, contained an item "open link in new window". Now it is gone. I want it back. Do I have to revert to v60 and turn off automatic updates?

The right-click context menu as late as yesterday, 8-01-18, contained an item "open link in new window". Now it is gone. I want it back. Do I have to revert to v60 and turn off automatic updates?

Kaikki vastaukset (5)

more options

I also want to get rid of "open in new tab".

more options

Normally the context menu for a link has:

  • Open Link in New Tab
  • Open Link in New Window {not shown in private windows}
  • Open Link in New Private Window

There's no built-in way to edit items on/off menus. Extensions can add an item to a menu, but not remove existing items.

more options

If you want to hide a menu item, you can do that using custom style rules in a userChrome.css file. Has that come up in any of your previous threads?

https://www.userchrome.org/what-is-userchrome-css.html

more options

jscher2000 said

If you want to hide a menu item, you can do that using custom style rules in a userChrome.css file. Has that come up in any of your previous threads? https://www.userchrome.org/what-is-userchrome-css.html

No. I will check it out.

Thank you, jscher2000

more options

jscher2000 said

Normally the context menu for a link has:
  • Open Link in New Tab
  • Open Link in New Window {not shown in private windows}
  • Open Link in New Private Window
There's no built-in way to edit items on/off menus. Extensions can add an item to a menu, but not remove existing items.

Well, now I have " Open Link in New Window" again. I'll have to try to reproduce the conditions under which it was missing.

Thanks, jscher200.