Single, infrequent emails show as blank
I get infrequent emails that show as blank. At first I thought it had to do with the sender as in one mailing list, one person's emails were always blank. Now, I have a good comparison between an email that displays correctly and one that shows the content as blank from the same sender. I've included the screen shots. I have saved the source of each email, but can't identify any differences in headers.
All Replies (3)
Source of invisible email: From - Fri May 25 15:55:00 2018 X-Account-Key: account1 X-UIDL: UID93084-1404536382 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: <[email protected]> Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: from x100.webserve.com by x100.webserve.com with LMTP id OOmxJ2GMCFtFUQQAFTxOQw for <[email protected]>; Fri, 25 May 2018 18:21:21 -0400 Return-path: <[email protected]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Fri, 25 May 2018 18:21:21 -0400 Received: from mail1.greenparty.ca ([166.78.242.163]:40643) by x100.webserve.com with esmtp (Exim 4.89_1) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1fML5L-001Be6-C8 for [email protected]; Fri, 25 May 2018 18:21:21 -0400 Received: from php1.greenparty.ca (php1.localdomain [10.210.131.193]) by mail1.greenparty.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E7B4B049 for <[email protected]>; Fri, 25 May 2018 18:20:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (ip6-localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php1.greenparty.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A9F12001E for <[email protected]>; Fri, 25 May 2018 22:20:39 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_1505f504f9e3784eb943e64054224300"
Reply-To: "Elizabeth May, MP" <[email protected]> From: "Elizabeth May, MP" <[email protected]> Subject: Elizabeth May's Week in Review List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> To: Alan James <[email protected]> Precedence: bulk X-CiviMail-Bounce: [email protected] Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 18:20:39 -0400 Message-Id: <[email protected]> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 X-Spam-Score: -8 X-Spam-Bar: / X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "x100.webserve.com",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
root\@localhost for details.
Content preview: [1] WEEK IN REVIEW: MAY 22 - 25 Welcome back to Elizabeth
May's parliamentary week in review! This weekly e-newsletter recaps her work
in Parliament when the House is in session. Using the links below, you can
watch videos of Elizabeth's interventions in the House, keep up with her
media releases, and read articles she has written. [...]
Content analysis details: (-0.9 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
[URIs: elizabethmaymp.ca]
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
1.0 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY Sending domain does not have any
anti-forgery methods
X-Spam-Flag: NO
--=_1505f504f9e3784eb943e64054224300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
[1]
WEEK IN REVIEW: MAY 22 - 25
<SNIP>
Modified by Alan James
Source of visible post: From - Fri May 11 13:07:16 2018 X-Account-Key: account1 X-UIDL: UID92259-1404536382 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: <[email protected]> Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: from x100.webserve.com by x100.webserve.com with LMTP id iBfPDtXj9VoSWCUAFTxOQw for <[email protected]>; Fri, 11 May 2018 14:41:25 -0400 Return-path: <[email protected]> Envelope-to: [email protected] Delivery-date: Fri, 11 May 2018 14:41:25 -0400 Received: from mail1.greenparty.ca ([166.78.242.163]:55024) by x100.webserve.com with esmtp (Exim 4.89_1) (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1fHCyo-00AGfD-Do for [email protected]; Fri, 11 May 2018 14:41:25 -0400 Received: from php1.greenparty.ca (php1.localdomain [10.210.131.193]) by mail1.greenparty.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E812D1C24E for <[email protected]>; Fri, 11 May 2018 14:40:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (ip6-localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php1.greenparty.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCADF12B89A for <[email protected]>; Fri, 11 May 2018 18:40:41 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_29c4216a1c612127a6ad381a16bf1c9b"
Reply-To: "Elizabeth May, MP" <[email protected]> From: "Elizabeth May, MP" <[email protected]> Subject: Elizabeth May's Week in Review List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]> To: Alan James <[email protected]> Precedence: bulk X-CiviMail-Bounce: [email protected] Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 14:40:41 -0400 Message-Id: <[email protected]> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 X-Spam-Score: -8 X-Spam-Bar: / X-Ham-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "x100.webserve.com",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
root\@localhost for details.
Content preview: [1] WEEK IN REVIEW: MAY 7 - 11 Welcome to Elizabeth May's
parliamentary week in review! This weekly e-newsletter recaps her work in
Parliament when the House is in session. Using the links below, you can watch
videos of Elizabeth's interventions in the House, keep up with her media
releases, and read articles she has written. [...]
Content analysis details: (-0.9 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
[URIs: greenparty.ca]
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
1.0 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY Sending domain does not have any
anti-forgery methods
X-Spam-Flag: NO
--=_29c4216a1c612127a6ad381a16bf1c9b Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
[1]
WEEK IN REVIEW: MAY 7 - 11 <SNIP>
The issue will almost certainly be it the body of the message, not the headers.
Would you care to forward both of those emails (as attachments) to [email protected]. Perhaps I can see why one would display and one not, and also check that they do not both display on my system.