Avatar for Username

Pomoc pśepytaś

Glědajśo se wobšudy pomocy. Njenapominajomy was nigda, telefonowy numer zawołaś, SMS pósłaś abo wósobinske informacije pśeraźiś. Pšosym dajśo suspektnu aktiwitu z pomocu nastajenja „Znjewužywanje k wěsći daś“ k wěsći.

Dalšne informacije

Toś ta nitka jo se archiwěrowała. Pšosym stajśo nowe pšašanje, joli trjebaśo pomoc.

Have all the hash values been included in hash table for Firefox v46.0?

  • 1 wótegrono
  • 1 ma toś ten problem
  • 7 naglědow
  • Slědne wótegrono wót philipp

yelsker
yelsker
more options

First, thanks for all the work so many of you do to produce Firefox. It's a terrific application and we've been using it for years. It's far and away our first choice for browsers- excellent job!

So my question is this: Have all the hash values been included in the table: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/SHA512SUMS ?

Having computed the SHA512 hash for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/win64/en-US/Firefox Setup 46.0.exe reveals no matching hash in the above-mentioned table, although computing a hash for, as an example for:

https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/mac/en-US/Firefox 46.0.dmg DOES find a corresponding match in the table.

For comparison, I checked the raw size of: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/45.0.2/ -> File SHA512SUMS 517K 12-Apr-2016 14:08

and for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/ -> File SHA512SUMS 186K 26-Apr-2016 21:18 so there seems to be a large discrepancy in the file sizes.

If there are missing hash values in the v46.0 hash table, could that table be updated to include the missing values so that the user community can properly verify the correct download of the v46.0 files?

Thanks again for all the work the community does!

First, thanks for all the work so many of you do to produce Firefox. It's a terrific application and we've been using it for years. It's far and away our first choice for browsers- excellent job! So my question is this: Have all the hash values been included in the table: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/SHA512SUMS ? Having computed the SHA512 hash for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/win64/en-US/Firefox Setup 46.0.exe reveals no matching hash in the above-mentioned table, although computing a hash for, as an example for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/mac/en-US/Firefox 46.0.dmg DOES find a corresponding match in the table. For comparison, I checked the raw size of: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/45.0.2/ -> File SHA512SUMS 517K 12-Apr-2016 14:08 and for: https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/46.0/ -> File SHA512SUMS 186K 26-Apr-2016 21:18 so there seems to be a large discrepancy in the file sizes. If there are missing hash values in the v46.0 hash table, could that table be updated to include the missing values so that the user community can properly verify the correct download of the v46.0 files? Thanks again for all the work the community does!

Wšykne wótegrona (1)

philipp
philipp
  • Moderator
more options

hi yelsker, please refer to https://rail.merail.ca/posts/firefox-460-and-sha512sums.html