Hilfe durchsuchen

Vorsicht vor Support-Betrug: Wir fordern Sie niemals auf, eine Telefonnummer anzurufen, eine SMS an eine Telefonnummer zu senden oder persönliche Daten preiszugeben. Bitte melden Sie verdächtige Aktivitäten über die Funktion „Missbrauch melden“.

Weitere Informationen

filter move followed by another move duplicates message

  • 3 Antworten
  • 3 haben dieses Problem
  • 4 Aufrufe
  • Letzte Antwort von Wirewrap

more options

Running Thunderbird 31.4.0 on Windows 7 64-bit

I have two filters in my inbox

Filter Wildcard: If To doesn´t contain "xxxxxxxx" Move message to Wildcard

Filter MoveAll: Move Message to Incoming

After sending a message that correctly goes to wildcard there is a unwanted action of "MoveAll" that makes a duplicate of the wildcarded message.

Filter log : Applied filter "Wildcard" to message from Lars <[email protected]> - sssss at 2015-02-06 22:51:08 moved message id = [email protected] to mailbox://nobody@Local%20Folders/Wildcard

Applied filter "MoveAll" to message from - at 1970-01-01 01:00:00 moved message id = to mailbox://nobody@Local%20Folders/Incoming

Running Thunderbird 31.4.0 on Windows 7 64-bit I have two filters in my inbox Filter Wildcard: If To doesn´t contain "xxxxxxxx" Move message to Wildcard Filter MoveAll: Move Message to Incoming After sending a message that correctly goes to wildcard there is a unwanted action of "MoveAll" that makes a duplicate of the wildcarded message. Filter log : Applied filter "Wildcard" to message from Lars <[email protected]> - sssss at 2015-02-06 22:51:08 moved message id = [email protected] to mailbox://nobody@Local%20Folders/Wildcard Applied filter "MoveAll" to message from - at 1970-01-01 01:00:00 moved message id = to mailbox://nobody@Local%20Folders/Incoming

Geändert am von Wirewrap

Ausgewählte Lösung

Maybe you need to add the "stop filter execution" action to the first filter?

Diese Antwort im Kontext lesen 👍 2

Alle Antworten (3)

more options

Ausgewählte Lösung

Maybe you need to add the "stop filter execution" action to the first filter?

more options

Zenos said

Maybe you need to add the "stop filter execution" action to the first filter?

Is there a point in having "Stop filter execution" as last action in a filter? I will try it and see.

For most messages, when the first filter isn´t triggered I want the second filter to take effect.

Sort of:

if (first filter trigger ) then

  <one action>

else

 <other action>

Geändert am von Wirewrap

more options

Zenos said

Maybe you need to add the "stop filter execution" action to the first filter?

This post removed, my mistake.

Geändert am von Wirewrap