Search Support

Avoid support scams. We will never ask you to call or text a phone number or share personal information. Please report suspicious activity using the “Report Abuse” option.

Learn More

Hierdie gesprek is in die argief. Vra asseblief 'n nuwe vraag as jy hulp nodig het.

Detaching attachment - shortcut

  • 2 antwoorde
  • 1 het hierdie probleem
  • 3 views
  • Laaste antwoord deur pjem

more options

Hi,

because the attachment extractor addon does not work anymore in version 78 and one must detach attachment manually per each message, is there some shortcut for Detach (Detach all) attachments from the message.

Working in Thunderbird has become very annoying and complicated since version 78 (when almost all useful addons are not more supported), so at least when doing annoying and complicated manual detaching of attachments in each message, it will be great to have a shortcut for this.

Thank you.

Hi, because the attachment extractor addon does not work anymore in version 78 and one must detach attachment manually per each message, is there some shortcut for Detach (Detach all) attachments from the message. Working in Thunderbird has become very annoying and complicated since version 78 (when almost all useful addons are not more supported), so at least when doing annoying and complicated manual detaching of attachments in each message, it will be great to have a shortcut for this. Thank you.

All Replies (2)

more options

The pre-release version of FiltaQuilla has an option to add Detach as a filter action, but I wasn't able to get it to work. The add-on is actively developed, so I would expect improvements in the near future.

https://github.com/RealRaven2000/FiltaQuilla/releases/tag/3.0pre40

more options

sfhowes said

The pre-release version of FiltaQuilla has an option to add Detach as a filter action, but I wasn't able to get it to work. The add-on is actively developed, so I would expect improvements in the near future. https://github.com/RealRaven2000/FiltaQuilla/releases/tag/3.0pre40

Hi, thank you for this info. I am testing it now but it does not work. :-(